| QST Magazine Product Reviews - Key Measurements Summary - HF-Transceivers or Receivers | ||||||||||||||
| Source: Product Review from QST Magazine - Many thanks to ARRL and QST Magazine for their very interesting reviews! | ||||||||||||||
| Receiver | Transmitter | |||||||||||||
| Subject of measurement, band: 14 MHz | 20 kHz blocking gain compression | 2 kHz blocking gain compression | NEW: 2 kHz reciprocal mixing noise | 20 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range | 2 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range | 20 kHz 3rd-order intercept | 2 kHz 3rd-order intercept | Rx-Tx turnaround time (SSB tx delay) | Transmit 3rd-order IMD | Transmit 9th-order IMD | Listprice in USD (September 2011) $ | |||
| Min/max of scale | 70/140 dB | 70 - 141 dB | 50/110 dB | 50/110 dB | -40/+35 dB | -40/+35 dB | 50/10 ms | -20/-35 dB | -20/-70 dB | |||||
| Transceivers/receivers sorted by 2 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range. Please take into account that there might be a difference in the numbers when comparing the older product reviews (before February 2007) compared to the later product reviews, due to changes in the testing methodology, measurements filters, etcetera. | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Yaesu FTdx5000D, December 2010 | 136 dB * | 136 dB * | -104 dBc | 114 dB ! | 114 dB ! | +41 dBm ! | +40 dBm ! | 37 ms | -43 dB #! | -72 dB #! | $ 7.700 | ||
| NEW | 2 | WiNRADIO WR-G31DDC | 128 dB | 128 dB | -128 dBc | 107 dB | 107 Db | +32 dBm | 32dBm | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ 899 | NEW |
| 3 | Elecraft K3, January 2009 | 142 dB ! | 140 dB | -86 dBc | 106 dB | 103 dB | +29 dBm | +28 dBm | 12 ms | -29 dB | -51 dB | $ 2.200 | ||
| 4 | Elecraft K3, April 2008 | 139 dB | 139 dB | -95 dBc | 103 dB | 102 dB | +26 dBm | +26 dBm | 22 ms | -27 dB | -53 dB | $ 2.200 | ||
| 5 | FlexRadio FLEX-5000A, July 2008 | 123 dB | 123 dB | -99 dBc | 99 dB | 99 dB | +35 dBm | +30 dBm | 29 ms | -34 dB | -54 dB | $ 2.799 | ||
| 6 | TenTec 599AT Eagle, August 2011 | 136 dB | 121 dB | -95 dBc | 98 dB | 98 dB | +22 dBm | +22 dBm | 16 ms | -28 dB | -48 dB | $ 1.795 | ||
| 7 | Kenwood TS-590S, May 2011 | 141 dB ! | 126 dB | -91 dBc | 106 dB | 97 dB | +26 dBm | +22 dBm | 14 ms | -29 dB | -52 dB | $ 1.964 | ||
| 8 | Perseus SDR, December 2008 | 129 dB | 129 dB | -126 dBc | 100 dB | 97 dB | +35 dBm | +35 dBm | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ 999 | ||
| 9 | Icom IC-7700, October 2008 | 125 dB | 102 dB | -78 dBc | 106 dB | 95 dB | +35 dBm | +24 dBm | 15 ms | -28 dB | -53 dB | $ 9.150 | ||
| 10 | TenTec Orion-II, September 2006 | 136 dB | 136 dB | N/M | 92 dB | 95 dB | +20 dBm | +21 dBm | 30 ms | -28 dB | -52 dB | $ 4.295 | ||
| 11 | Flex-3000, Oct/Nov 2009 | 113 dB | 113 dB | -112 dBc | 99 dB | 95 dB | +28 dBm | +26 dBm | 48 ms | -30 dB | -45 dB | $ 1.699 | ||
| 12 | Icom IC-7410, October 2011 | 143 dB ! | 111 dB | -78 dBc | 106 dB | 88 dB | +29 dBm | +5 dBm | 45 ms | -30 dB | -61 dB | $ 2.475 | ||
| 13 | Icom IC-7600, November 2009 | 122 dB | 102 dB | -82 dBc | 106 dB | 88 dB | +31 dBm | +13 dBm | 13 ms | -31 dB | -48 dB | $ 4.976 | ||
| 14 | Icom IC-7800 V2, March 2007 | 144 dB ! | 117 dB | N/M | 108 dB | 86 dB | +38 dBm ! | +22 dBm | 15 ms | -32 dB | -52 dB | $ 15.956 | ||
| 15 | FlexRadio FLEX-1500, December 2011 | 107 dB | 107 dB | -107 dBc | 100 dB | 86 dB | +31 dBm | +13 dBm | 200 ms | -22 dB | -48 dB | $ 649 | ||
| 16 | Yaesu FTdx9000MP, July 2010 | 137 dB | 102 dB | -92 dBc | 99 dB | 85 dB | +28 dBm | +7 dBm | 32 ms | -37 dB #! | >-75 dB #! | $ 11.749 | ||
| 17 | TenTec R4020 QRP, February 2011 | N/M | N/M | N/M | 84 dB | 84 dB | -10 dB | -10 dB | N/M | N/M | N/M | $ 249 | ||
| 18 | TenTec Omni-VII, July 2007 | 137 dB | 134 dB | N/M | 91 dB | 82 dB | +11 dBm | +6,5 dBm | 20 ms | -27 dB | -55 dB | $ 2.695 | ||
| 19 | Icom IC-R9500, January 2008 | 144 dB ! | 109 dB | -92 dBc | 5kHz/92 dB | 81 dB | +32 dBm | -4dBm | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ 17.000 | ||
| 20 | Yaesu FTdx9000C, March 2006 | 128 dB | 97 dB | N/M | 101 dB | 78 dB | +35 dBm | +1 dBm | 35 ms | -34 dB # | -80 dB #! | $ 6.400 | ||
| 21 | Yaesu FT-450D, November 2011 | 134 dB | 88 dB | -74 dBc | 97 dB | 76 dB | +16 dBm | -21 dBm | 17 ms | -25 dB | -50 dB | $ 1.340 | ||
| 22 | Yaesu FT-950, March 2008 | 128 dB | 98 dB | -57 dBc | 95 dB | 71 dB | +21 dBm | -4 dBm | 25 ms | -35 dB | -56 dB | $ 2.000 | ||
| 23 | Alinco DX-SR8T, June 2011 | 100 dB | 83 dB | -60 dBc | 94 dB | 70 dB | +1 dB | -30 dB | 50 ms | -28dB | -53 dB | $ 580 | ||
| 24 | Yaesu FT-2000D, October 2007 | 136 dB | 87 dB | -76 dBc | 98 dB | 69 dB | +26 dBm | -16 dBm | 37 ms | -41 dB #! | -65 dB # | $ 4.800 | ||
| 25 | Icom IC-7200, June 2009 | 140 dB | 83 dB | -85 dBc | 99 dB | 67 dB | +23 dBm | -11 dBm | 30 ms | -32 dB | -58 dB | $ 1.396 | ||
| 26 | Yaesu FT-450, December 2007 | 134 dB | 90 dB | -21 dBc | 97 dB | 67 dB | +13 dBm | -31 dBm | 40 ms | -30 dB | -48 dB | N/A | ||
| 27 | Yaesu FT-2000, February 2007 | 126 dB | 92 dB | N/M | 95 dB | 64 dB | +16 dBm | -22 dBm | 27 ms | -32 dB | -60 dB | $ 3.900 | ||
| 28 | Icom IC-7000, May 2006 | 112 dB | 86 dB | N/M | 89 dB | 63 dB | +6 dBm | -27 dBm | 12 ms | -33 dB | -58 dB | $ 1.699 | ||
| Transceivers/receivers sorted by 2 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range. Please take into account that there might be a difference in the numbers when comparing the older product reviews (before February 2007) compared to the later product reviews, due to changes in the testing methodology, measurements filters, etcetera. | ||||||||||||||
| Subject of measurement, band: 14 MHz | 20 kHz blocking gain compression | 2 kHz blocking gain compression | NEW: 2 kHz reciprocal mixing noise | 20 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range | 2 kHz 3rd-order dynamic range | 20 kHz 3rd-order intercept | 2 kHz 3rd-order intercept | Rx-Tx turnaround time (SSB tx delay) | Transmit 3rd-order IMD | Transmit 9th-order IMD | Listprice in USD (September 2011) $ | |||
| Min/max of scale | 70/140 dB | 70 - 141 dB | 50/110 dB | 50/110 dB | -40/+35 dB | -40/+35 dB | 50/10 ms | -20/-35 dB | -20/-70 dB | |||||
| Receiver | Transmitter | |||||||||||||
| * = Blocking exceeded the levels indicated | ||||||||||||||
| # = Class A operation | ||||||||||||||
| ! = below/above measurable levels | ||||||||||||||
| $ = Listprice in US according to Elecraft, FlexRadio, TenTec and Universal Radio | ||||||||||||||
| N/M = Not measured | ||||||||||||||
| Please take into account that there might be a difference in the numbers when comparing the older product reviews (before February 2007) compared to the later product reviews, due to | ||||||||||||||
| changes in the testing methodology, measurements filters, etcetera. | ||||||||||||||
| Green = excellent | ||||||||||||||
| Light green = good | ||||||||||||||
| Yellow = average | ||||||||||||||
| Orange = moderate | ||||||||||||||
| Red = poor | ||||||||||||||
| Blocking gain compression: When a very strong off channel signal appears at the input to a receiver it is often found that the sensitivity is reduced. The effect arises because the | ||||||||||||||
| front end amplifiers run into compression as a result of the off channel signal. This often arises when a receiver and transmitter are run from the same site and the transmitter signal is | ||||||||||||||
| exceedingly strong. When this occurs it has the effect of suppressing all the other signals trying to pass through the amplifier, giving the effect of a reduction in gain. | ||||||||||||||
| Blocking is generally specified as the level of the unwanted signal at a given offset (normally 20 kHz) which will give a 3 dB reduction in gain. A good receiver may be able to withstand signals | ||||||||||||||
| of about ten milliwatts before this happens. | ||||||||||||||
| The blocking specification is now more important than it was many years ago. With the increase in radio communications systems in use, it is quite likely that a radio transmitter will be | ||||||||||||||
| operating in the close vicinity to a receiver. If the radio receiver is blocked by the neighbouring transmitter then it can seriously degrade the performance of the overall radio communications | ||||||||||||||
| system. | ||||||||||||||
| Reciprocal mixing: a key radio receiver performance parameter which becomes particularly important when signals apart from the wanted one are strong. Reciprocal mixing results from | ||||||||||||||
| the phase noise performance of the local oscillators within the radio receiver. In general the majority of the phase noise is generated by the main synthesizer within the receiver. When the | ||||||||||||||
| phase noise from the local oscillator signal is superimposed onto a strong off channel signal, this can mask out a much lower level wanted signal that is within the receiver's passband. | ||||||||||||||
| Dynamic range: the difference in decibels between the weakest signal the receiver can handle and the strongest signal the same receiver can handle simultaneously, | ||||||||||||||
| - without the need of using additional controls of the receiver, manually carried out by the operator - within 20 kHz (wide spaced) and 2 kHz (close in) within the receiver's passband. | ||||||||||||||
| For more information on this important item, written by Rob Sherwood NC0B, please use this link: http://www.sherweng.com/documents/Barc2008.pdf | ||||||||||||||
| 3rd order intercept: this more or less theoretical point, gives a good indication of a receiver's overall strong signal performance. Third order intercept is related to two-tone third order | ||||||||||||||
| IMD. When receiver's response on desired and undesired signals (within the passband) were plotted in the same graph, the two lines would intersect at a point called the third-order intercept. | ||||||||||||||
| Tx-Rx turnaround time: the delay between receive and transmit, important for digital modes. A transmit-to-receive delay of 35 ms or less in SSB indicates that the rig is suitable for | ||||||||||||||
| digital operation. | ||||||||||||||
| Transmit 3rd and 9th order IMD: transmit two-tone intermodulation distortion, or two-tone IMD, is a measure of spurious output close to the desired audio of a transmitter being | ||||||||||||||
| operated in SSB mode. This spurious output is often created in the audio stages of a transceiver, but any amplification stage can contribute! | ||||||||||||||
| If you have ever heard someone causing "splatter", the noisy audio that extends beyond a normal 3 kHz nominal SSB bandwidth, then you have heard the effects of transmit IMD. | ||||||||||||||
| Frequencies close to the transmit signal are affected the most, but depending on the amount of IMD, large portions of the band can suffer from one poor transmitter! | ||||||||||||||
| For more information (including what the numbers really mean) please read ARRL's QST Magazine August 2004 very interesting article on the pages 32-36. | ||||||||||||||
| v DEC.17.2011 | ||||||||||||||
| Please send me an e-mail (to: hans at pa1hr dot nl) if you have corrections, remarks, etc. | ||||||||||||||
| Disclaimer: | ||||||||||||||
| The following applies to the page you are currently viewing. By the page, you agree to this disclaimer. | ||||||||||||||
| This overview is provided for your convenience by Hans PA1HR; it is a summary of measurement figures and gives | ||||||||||||||
| no indication of the ergonomics, the features and/or the operational characteristics of the transceivers/receivers. | ||||||||||||||
| The measurement figures in this overview are from the ARRL Laboratory and published in QST. | ||||||||||||||
| This page is just a non-official overview, where one should draw any conclusions. | ||||||||||||||
| The overview on this page is written with the utmost care, yet, PA1HR assumes no liability for any inaccuracies in the displayed. | ||||||||||||||
| PA1HR is not responsible for the content in this overview, on this page and/or companies referenced. | ||||||||||||||